Manutan claws back 25% of storage admin time in switch to Pure

A thorny technical challenge for Manutan has been storage of data that is growing in volume by 5% a year. Another is to ensure that website transactions never last more than five second so customers don’t cancel purchases due to time taken.

“We evaluated the market to replace our HPE 3Par arrays with more modern equipment,” said Coquio. “Among the likely candidates, Pure Storage rapidly seduced us with the offer of a free proof-of-concept. They deployed the hardware, we used it for a period of time, and the deal was that they would take it back if it did not meet our needs.”

In a company like Manutan everything is measured meticulously. That approach was applied to the Pure arrays and their effect on the work of teams in the organisation.

A big gain measured was that a quarter of the time previously spent managing storage was saved. “To gain 25% of your time back is precious,” said Coquio. “Because that allows our teams to push on more quickly with projects the business is waiting for, such as the deployment of virtual offices on VDI from our datacentres to subsidiaries.”

In technical terms the Pure Storage arrays brought a number of advantages over the HPE 3Par hardware, which had been in place since 2013. For example, each 3Par array takes up 36U of rack space, runs 32 power supplies of 700w and by their end-of-life held 193TB of useable capacity (from 63TB at initial deployment).

Now, each of the two Pure Storage FlashArray//X50 arrays occupies just 5U, with four 500w power supplies, to provide 250TB of useable storage at the outset, recently increased to 360TB.

Latency on business intelligence and ERP applications was 3 to 5 milliseconds on the 3Par arrays, but that’s down to less than 1 millisecond on Pure. Throughput, measured from Rubrik backup software, was 2.5GBps for 3Par but is now 6.8GBps on FlashArray.

While carrying out testing in 2017 the 3Par hardware crashed. “That was a trial by fire,” said Coquio. “To restore 3Par would have taken too long. So we took the decision to move all non-critical applications and data, such as development servers, to FlashArray to take pressure off 3Par.”

“We were surprised by the efficiency. With only a weekend to play with, we regained normal functionality. So, we signed up with Pure Storage. Three months later, at the start of 2018, all our production was migrated to FlashArray.”

Manutan was so satisfied with Pure that it plans to buy pairs of FlashArray//X10 nodes for each of its seven warehouses.

“With Pure Storage we don’t worry any more about whether our storage infrastructure will support our growth,” said Coquio. “Our contract stipulates that Pure will regularly upgrade to the most recent SSDs and controller hardware and that’s what has happened since 2018. We meet Pure regularly and they present what’s new. If we want to make changes it is planned for and costs us no time.”

Quicker to react

Coquio adds that Pure’s support is also quicker to react than HPE’s.

Since the cyber attack in February, Manutan has taken the step of building two new and more secure datacentres. Ageing servers have been replaced with the latest Nutanix hyper-converged infrastructure. Only the Pure Storage arrays have been retained from the previous hardware stack because they are the only elements that could keep pace with the organisation’s needs.

“We have a project to switch our business intelligence to a Cloudera cluster. Our technical choices are still not decided but it is highly likely we will go for Pure Storage again for storage for this cluster,” said Coquio, who adds that it would likely be Pure’s FlashBlade NAS and object storage product for this use case rather than FlashArray.

“In reality, the difficulty isn’t the choice of storage infrastructure, but rather scoping out the project, and for that we have to wait for our data scientists.”